FFA Congress - Football NSW
You may be aware of the controversy about who gets to elect the Directors of Football Federation Australia.
Attached below is the view of Football NSW.
Attached below is the view of Football NSW.
Football NSW Letter
We
are writing to you with respect to the Football Federation Australia
(FFA) Statutes (Constitution) compliance matter you may have recently
read about and may be aware of.
Following
on from queries at our recent Annual General Meeting on Friday 31
March, the Board of Football NSW has decided to update all members with
respect to the process and progress on the amendment of FFA Statutes
towards fulfilment and accordance with FIFA and Asian Football
Confederation (AFC) standards and expectations of best-practice.
The Situation
The matter relates to FFA’s existing statutes and the need to expand representation of its membership congress.
The
issue dates to 2015, when FIFA and AFC first notified FFA of the need
to raise the issue with members, and the need to address it.
To
summarise what has become a delicate and necessary challenge,
essentially, the FFA Statutes currently do not fulfil FIFA and AFC
expected standards, and requirements for best-practice governance, as
follows:
· No single stakeholder group should have a significant controlling power (that is, say, more than two-thirds or 66.6% majority). Currently state and territory federations hold 90% voting rights (being 9 votes from a total 10); and
· Broader
stakeholder representation at national federation level is required.
That is, the inclusion of what are termed ‘Special Interest Groups’
(that is, groups representing specific stakeholders like Players,
Women’s Football, Coaches, Referees, Futsal, Clubs, etc.). In respect to
this matter relating to FFA, the A-League clubs and Professional
Footballers Australia are seeking greater representation within the FFA
congress. Currently, the A-League clubs (through the Association of
Professional Football Clubs) hold 1 vote from a total 10. Professional
Footballers Australia, who represent professional players, hold no votes
given they are not currently members of FFA’s Congress.
On
the matter of Special Interest Groups, presently, there is insufficient
support amongst the FFA Membership to include ‘Special Interest Groups’
for Coaches, Referees, Women’s Football, or Futsal within the Congress
(in the immediate term), on the basis that these stakeholders do not
have appropriately instituted, governed and operated national bodies
that represent them.
Conversely,
the FFA Membership has indicated support for the inclusion of
Professional Footballers Australia (PFA) as a member of FFA’s Congress,
as they:
· Represent a stakeholder group not currently represented or with voting rights at state and territory member federations;
· Have been appropriately incorporated, in 1993;
· Have a clearly defined membership;
· Have
an acceptable constitution and organisational regulations, with
demonstrated commitment to achieving the objectives and purposes for
more than 23 years;
· Have an established Board Electoral process and an accordingly elected board; and
· Have a full-time, qualified management team
Moreover,
and especially in NSW, each of the stakeholder groups mentioned earlier
already has direct and appropriate representation within Football NSW’s
Congress.
The Process and Football NSW’s position
Since
September 2016, when FIFA and AFC visited Australia and met to raise
and discuss the issue with each stakeholder group, FFA Members have been
required to examine and consider how to address the current
constitutional deficiencies towards compliance with FIFA and AFC
standards and expectations, and study the optimal governance model for
the FFA Congress moving forward, including an independent A-League.
Throughout
this process, Football NSW has maintained open, respectful and
empathetic dialogue with our peer state federations, the A-League clubs,
the PFA, and the FFA, and we continue to work actively, positively and
respectfully with all stakeholders in contributing to help resolve the
matter for the football community and fans, to whom we are ultimately
entrusted to service and develop the game.
Despite
these efforts, there currently exists an impasse amongst the
stakeholders in agreeing to the acceptable congress model, which has
delayed the progress of resolving the situation.
Of most interest to you, the Board of Football NSW recently resolved unanimously
in favour of a 9-5-1 position (being 9 Member Federations, 5 for
A-League clubs and 1 for Special Interest Groups, namely Professional
Footballers Australia).
Significantly, our position is independent and different
to the position favoured and encouraged by FFA’s board and management
(which incidentally, has been adopted by the state and territory
federations of Northern Territory, Tasmania, Northern NSW, ACT, Western
Australia, South Australia, and Queensland), which is 9-3-1.
Importantly, our position is equally independent and different
to the preferred position determined by the A-League clubs and the PFA,
which is 9-6-2. That is, 9 Member Federations, 6 for A-League clubs and
2 for the PFA (1 for professional men players and 1 for professional
women players).
Quite
distinctly, the Board of Football NSW has approached and considered
this significant matter judiciously, rationally and independently in the
best interests of football, both nationally and in NSW.
The underlying rationale for the position resolved by the Board of Football NSW is three-fold.
Firstly,
Football NSW supports any model that encourages and delivers a
governance and membership model with greater transparency and
accountability, and broader stakeholder representation to include those
stakeholders who demonstrate a professional, respectable, transparent
and determined commitment and investment in the facilitation and
development at all levels of football.
Additionally,
the rationale for the position resolved has been considered against the
expectations and constraints established and required by all
stakeholders involved, including FIFA and the AFC.
Finally,
the position resolved by the Board of Football NSW demonstrates an
astute, mature and reasonable approach to delivering a compromise
position that clearly brings about greater transparency and
accountability, broader representation, that protects and develops
football’s grassroots, and establishes cooperative and respectful
relationships amongst all stakeholders for the first time. Ultimately, it also helps us achieve the necessary compliance expected from FIFA and the AFC.
Attached,
you will find a decision-making matrix that the Board of Football NSW
developed to help consider and rationalise its position. We hope that
this document provides additional insight into the process we have
undertaken to consider the situation, as well as demonstrate clear
decision-making transparency to our members and stakeholders.
Coincidentally,
and reassuringly, the Board of Football Federation Victoria (FFV) have
also arrived and resolved their position to the same position resolved
by Football NSW.
Moving Forward towards Resolution
We
have come to understand, that FFA has recently sought the permission of
FIFA and the AFC for an extension of the deadline date (previously
being 31 March) for bringing the FFA Statutes in-line with FIFA and AFC
requirements and expectations.
Although
the Board of Football NSW is disappointed that we have not been able
resolve the matter within the original timeline established, in the
spirit of good faith, we have conformed to accept the request for
extension in the hope that continued dialogue amongst the stakeholders,
in the coming weeks and month, will help bring about quickly the
necessary resolutions that help achieve a compliant and stronger
governance framework for and within FFA.
We
hope that the information provided herein provides you with a clear
understanding of this significant issue and gives you comfort in the
approach your Board has undertaken on behalf of its members and
stakeholders.
On behalf of the Board of Football NSW,
Anter Isaac,
Football NSW Chairman
Comments